/film/ - FILM

d1e97eace1c3c2b32452ea3d4f58eb31.jpg
[Hide] (106.6KB, 800x600) Reverse

>>3599
More and more I'm getting pushed toward piracy, but I still haven't found a cracked version of Resolve without a bunch of comments complaining that it's buggy. I question whether the free and cracked versions could peacefully co-exist on one machine (or that I have room for both). So I continue working around the limitations.

Man it is tough to make subtitles for movies you didn't enjoy much or downright dislike.

>>3750
Whatever possesses you to do that?

film.png
[Hide] (23.7KB, 942x399) Reverse

At some point recently archive.org excluded all 8ch.net related links
Here is a still existing archive of the old board: https://archive.fo/07wKl#selection-1953.0-1953.12
It's unfortunate that a lot of those images were lost, especially from the shots/stills thread. Does anyone have a working archive of the old board, possibly with images? I still liked going back to it once every several months and finding something new. I miss the collages.
There is also this but it is only stills: https://web.archive.org/web/20200728024531/https://julay.world/film/res/108.html
As I was looking through this stuff I found that this url still exists: https://8ch.net/film/ 
I didn't know that 8kun reacquired it.

The 3x3 threads on halfchan are not interesting. 
I never made my own collages but posted screenshots a long time ago. Did people just throw screen caps in a mosaic maker or did they actually take time to photoshop everything?

>>3755
>Did people just throw screen caps in a mosaic maker or did they actually take time to photoshop everything?
I used Photoshop but i also only made joke collages and joke still sheets only
>archive.org excluded all 8ch.net related links
8ch is nowadays considered an extremist/fascist legend of the internet, its name and presence getting political is normal even when we all know it was just a place to post about things.
It's a miracle tho that those old spammers and saboteurs aren't around anymore posting pizza or reporting the domains to fuck us up. We are at peace finally but almost dead, almost 7 years after the de-platforming.

>>3758 (OP) 
What is row 4 middle column?

>>3758 (OP) 
tfw thought about it and realised the only film I saw last year was Warfare

>>3758 (OP) 
are you the same anon who has done these charts in the past? I recall that you liked Aggro Dr1ft, what did you think of Baby Invasion?

>>3762
>Baby Invasion
Not that guy but I see Harmony Korine's perpetually declining mental health has reached a new low. Man and I thought Trash Humpers was absolute garbage (no pun intended)

>>3759
Dry Leaf dir. Koberidze | ? | Resurrection dir. Gan
? | ? | Fiume o morte! dir. Bezinović
The Blue Trail dir. Mascaro | Magellan dir. Diaz | ?
Sand City dir. Hasan | Sermon to the Void dir. Baydarov | The Lake dir. Aragno
? | Better Go Mad in the Wild dir. Remo | Pompei: Below the Clouds dir. Rosi
? | ? | ?
Good Valley Stories dir. Guerin | Al Oeste, En Zapata dir. Bim | Barrio Triste dir. Stillz

What is row 1 column 2?

>>3763
He's always been insane. He was a terrible drug addict in his formative years. I thought the movie was interesting but I couldn't call it good or anything like that. I really enjoyed this older film called Los Bastardos, which strangely reminded me of Korine's movies, but I thought that film was significantly better. 
This seemed like a very strong year for film in general. 
I frequented the theater this year and saw some pretty bad movies that were fun for a night out.

no 2025?

>>3752
Be the change you want to see in the board anon.

>>3753
I don't go to festivals as the other person did. I learned from their film posts. It's unfortunate that they stopped posting their grids. They were a unique aspect of this board that  I do not want to and literally cannot embody for the time being.

Architecton dir. Kossakovsky | ? | Talking with Rivers dir. Makhmalbaf
Sanatorium Under the Sign of the Hourglass dir. Brothers Quay | Sermon to the Birds dir. Baydarov | Afternoons of Solitude dir. Serra
The Wolves Always Come at Night dir. Brady | ? | ?
? | Grand Tour dir. Gomes | Scenarios dir. Godard
Pepe dir. Arias | Lolo & Sosaku: The Western Archive dir. Caballero | ?
Abiding Nowhere dir. Ming-liang | ? | ?
The Garden Cadences dir. Komljen | Journey of Shadows dir. Netzhammer | Tristan und Isolde dir. Grandrieux

>>3754
Film festivals are for rich art snobs with lots of free time

>>643
>but because they are unorthodox for the board's theme (aka not really classy stuff, Shaw Bros iron flag related)
My current tastes (American classics and ultra-low budget trash) don't really seem like appropriate discussion material. And yeah, I don't have much to say. 

It's fine lurking and just reading other posts every now and then. 
In terms of other sites, no I don't really visit any except a couple private trackers, IMDB and I still sometimes scroll through Letterboxd lists even though I don't have an account.

>>646
You should keep pursuing other companies. The world always needs more archivists. It's a bummer when I watch a great film that hasn't seen any other release other than some shit VHS.

[End of Dump JW19 ~ 02/20/2020]

Only tvch

>>3735
Same.

>>3735
I went on there after seeing this and I hadn't been to anything /tv/ related for a decade. Amazing how it's the exact same as /tv/ was on infinitychan.

>>3736 (OP) 
What does 'a group' for /film/ mean?

>>3737
A group for /FILM/

>>3738
Lol, no kidding!?  :D

Can the uninitiate grasp the practical meaning of it?

>>3739
No comment

>>3640
Why shouldn’t it be involved in film? Your argument about painting and photography is barely applicable. Many artists take photos of their subjects and then copy the photos to their painting. AI is simply another tool that can be used or not used depending on how the filmmaker is making their movie. Anyone who believes in continually defining what movies actually are won’t outright dismiss a tool that’s in its infancy. And no, jackasses making AI slop and calling it a movie (like some of what’s been posted in this thread) is not at all what I am justifying or defending.

ambersons.jpg
[Hide] (250.1KB, 804x858) Reverse

I don't think AI is sophisticated enough to pull this off yet—generating 43 min. of lost footage for The Magnificent Ambersons. I suppose it's a marketing stunt for "Showrunner".

https://www.indiewire.com/news/breaking-news/lost-ending-orson-welles-magnificent-ambersons-ai-remake-1235148945/

The studios always get blamed for mangling this film but most of Orson's films had post-production problems. Clearly he put a low priority on properly finishing a project.

I'm skeptical that the original footage would have improved Ambersons very much, beyond the early single-take shot that was chopped down.

aioz.mp4
[Hide] (15.6MB, 720x1280, 02:24)

I'm okay with this (AI expansion of OZ)

cool_computer_image.jpg
[Hide] (70KB, 750x411) Reverse

>opens thread
>ctrl+f
>types "ethics"
>0 results
/film/ always was and forever will be shite, people don't even watch movies anymore. in addition to that, please elaborate on why /film/ is fond of AI art. there is a simple answer.

>>3714
>Ethics
Ever changing, particularly in these volatile times, so discussing them can be futile.
Also it's a tool, ambiguous in its results but a tool all the same, if we are going to discuss ethics we should start with the ones using it rather than the full range the developers give us. 
I haven't even touched the video editing software but i've met people who use AI and they hail it as God's gift mainly because they can replace tons of shit that would otherwise cost unholy amounts of money for independent creators outside the big money cities and regions.
In theory we could automate something around 5 to 10 minutes for free if we know how to edit and pull out a good script.

>>3633
Flow was fantastic and beautiful, one of the best non anime animated films I've seen in years. And it's always cool to see blender get more use. Also:
>No nig nogs
>No fat ugly women
>No race mixing
>No gays
>No cringe jokes that only exist to virtue single gay opinions and make libtards clap like seals 
>An adorable capybara I'd give my life for

>>3645
>>No nig nogs
>>No fat ugly women
>>No race mixing
>>No gays
>>No cringe jokes that only exist to virtue single gay opinions and make libtards clap like seals
This. I thought teh monke/kot dynamic was pretty good as well. Cheers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQElJP1AaS0&t=97s

>>3633
I’ve grown too cynical over the years to take this kind of news as anything but worthless. Either the academy was interested in changing things up (for renewed interest, credibility, and optics in general, appealing to “alternative” audiences), Blender had some sort of in with this whole ordeal and it somehow amounts to easy promotion, and/or the director is another wet towel who will be directing shit in a few years for big studios (most, if not all,  directors start low budget). The animation itself is ugly in general although the movements are interesting. Regardless, winning an academy award and attending that event sounds like a nightmare and it would be hard to respect the director or anyone involved or to take them seriously as artists. I can’t imagine this movie being good.

>>892
This was a masterpiece. It's crazy how he managed to express what so many people think and feel without ever expressing it.

43860.jpg
[Hide] (557.8KB, 742x1078) Reverse

I watched Krabat from Karel Zeman recently. I'm more into his work that combines animation with live-action filming and trick photography, but I think it's worth a watch. I'd like to watch his other feature-length cartoons from the final phase of his career, but I wish his work was more readily available. The guy was brilliant. He gets compared to Ray Harryhausen, but I think that his work was more versatile and artistically interesting despite his stop-motion skills not being on Harryhausen's level. He had a much bigger bag of tricks to incorporate into his work. Even a cutout animation film like Krabat has some interesting effects techniques other than raw cutout animation.

>>3703 (OP) 
I just love fauxteur 
I know of nothing else 
Only /film/
Kino is fake and gay

>>3703 (OP) 
Wasn't Dewaere a known sex pest back then?
>cannot imagine having "carnal vicinity" with a woman of less than 35 years of age
I cannot think of that actually happening to me but i sure can imagine it

>>3706
Young women are rapists, it's obvious isn't it.

my_little_princess_imdb.jpg
[Hide] (108.5KB, 1280x720) Reverse

>be eva ionesco
>made a sodom and gomorrah tier international whore at age 10 by own mother
>fast forward 35 years
>writes and directs movie about how her mom made her a whore
>depicts mom with 0 sympathy with a cinematic portrait of a deranged and delusional proto art ho
>casts an 11 year old girl as her child self
>makes that 11 year old act out the whorish scenes of her past
>thus makes another prepubescent girl into an international whore
>thus turns into her mother
>NOOOO MY MOM IS BAD FOR MAKING ME A WHORE FOR HER FAKE ART BUT WHEN I DO IT ITS REAL ARTTTTTTTT AAAAHHHHH

whores beget whores. never forget bros

Hot

>>2619
> in this case "wind" is part of religious ritual in the south

Upon further review, the religious ritual counteracts the "wind of jinn" which supposedly scatters people around the world via "many emigrations". I don't know how this odd phenomenon developed, but perhaps it all makes sense in the documentary.

yazd-gigapixel-standard-scale-2_00x.png
[Hide] (11.6MB, 2362x2984) Reverse

>>1299
here's an upscale cause I couldn't find a better res out there

vlcsnap-2023-05-14-19h16m23s551.jpg
[Hide] (69.1KB, 1024x572) Reverse

vlcsnap-2023-05-14-19h16m59s064.jpg
[Hide] (83.5KB, 1024x572) Reverse

vlcsnap-2023-05-14-19h18m02s554.jpg
[Hide] (201.7KB, 1024x572) Reverse

vlcsnap-2023-05-14-19h17m39s422.jpg
[Hide] (69.9KB, 1024x572) Reverse

vlcsnap-2023-05-14-19h16m37s761.jpg
[Hide] (114.5KB, 1024x572) Reverse

>>2360

I finally watched Tall Shadows of the Wind. It's a real gut punch, even though I already knew the basic concept of the film.
The villagers aren't as superstitious as plot summaries make it sound, though. They're mostly reasonable until they're confronted by terrifying circumstances.

image-w1280_(1).jpg
[Hide] (121.1KB, 1280x720) Reverse

>>1299
>>2654

17292439682_29e107184a_k.jpg
[Hide] (658.3KB, 1408x2048) Reverse

>>370
>A Separation
Just saw this mentionned a few days back and gave it a go, what actually blew me away is that it's not in the least trying to be impressive like many pretentious movies nowdays. It's just a simple, down to earth movie that fucking works. The last scene felt like a tribute to Nolan, or at least a reference to Inception.
Feels like I discovered a gold mine

>>3688
I just wish I read Cuddihy before watching Slums of Beverly Hills

🐇

>everything i doňt like is reddit

>>3688
>She's a kike
So what? Are you implying kikes can't make good movies?

>>3695
Women and jews are a dangerous combination and nowadays it's rare to find something decent in the medium from either of those groups, let alone a mixture.
Now if we talk about actors then that's a different thing.